Tag: Visual edit |
Tag: Visual edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{OtherIdentity|image1=[[Neopronouns.png]]}}{{Cleanup|reason=Needs more sources about historical neopronouns (thin, etc), usage section needs statistics on neopronouns from the gender census}} |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
==History== |
==History== |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | The earliest example of what could be called a nounself pronoun was proposed by by American lawyer Charles Crozat Converse in 1884. Converse took the words "this one" and "that one" and proposed ''thon'' as a gender-neutral pronoun set.{{Quote|thon. Pronoun of the 3rd person, common gender, meaning “that one, he she, or it”: a neoterism proposed by Charles Crozat Converse, and apparently complying with the neoteristic canons, since it supplies an antecedent blank, obeys a simple and obvious analogy, and is euphonious.|—Funk and Wagnalls, Supplement to A Standard Dictionary of the English Language, 1903|https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/third-person-gender-neutral-pronoun-thon}}For most of the 20th century, ''thon'' appeared in various publications of Funk and Wagnalls, and also spread to another dictionary, Merriam-Webster’s Second New International Dictionary (1934 edition). ''Thon'' was removed from abridged dictionary in the third edition. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | Using fae as a pronoun started out half a joke, a 1am offhand comment that fae would be one of the only things I could use as a pronoun and identify with. The next morning, it wasn’t so much a joke anymore, and by the end of the day my girlfriend and I had come up with how fae would work as a pronoun. |
||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | My personal view on this is that fae and fae creatures as stand outside the binary. They probably have some form of gender, but it’s most definitely not our human binary. Angels, on the other hand, are genderless. They have no sex and they have no gender. Together, fae and angels are the two sides of androgyny that are possible, and kind of form a secondary arc around the male/female binary: that of gendered/genderless. |
||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | …so in some ways, I’m using fae as a giant ‘fuck you’ to the gender binary and a refusal of much of the American culture surrounding gender. My gender is yes. Except when it’s no. Either way, it’s not male or female and using a pronoun that is very associated with creatures that stand outside humankind is, for me at least, a very good way to remind people of this constantly.|Eidolan}} |
||
| − | |||
| − | Also in 2015, Tumblr blog pronouns-archive begaj posting guides for using various sets of pronouns. It became the first (recorded) posting of many nounself sets, including willowself<ref>https://pronouns-archive.tumblr.com/post/134390254211/willwillowwil</ref>, starself,<ref>https://pronouns-archive.tumblr.com/post/136852029841/starstarstarsstarself-please</ref> beeself<ref>https://pronouns-archive.tumblr.com/post/146517879731/bee-pronoun-anon-here-you-can-just-post-it-wo</ref> and various gem-based pronouns<ref>https://pronouns-archive.tumblr.com/tagged/gems/chrono</ref>. The blog became inactive permanently in 2020. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | *Another common claim is that using fae/faer or similar pronouns is cultural appropriate against Pagans/Celtrics; However these aren't the only cultures that have fae<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairy#Origins</ref>, the original coiner identified as a fae faerself<ref>https://heterosexualisnotadefault.tumblr.com/post/635251444970291201/pronouns-i-have-encountered-in-no-particular-order</ref>, and Celts and Pagans are statistically more likely to feel actively good <ref>https://everypronoun.tumblr.com/post/644179322689798144/on-faefaer-pronouns-and-cultural-appropriation</ref>about someone’s fae/faer pronouns, even when that person is not a Celt/Pagan. |
||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | File:Nounself Pronouns (2).png|A nounself pronouns pride flag. |
||
| − | File:Nounself Pronouns (1).png|A nounself pronouns pride flag. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | File:Thon pronouns in dictionary.jpeg |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | <references /> |
||
| − | |||
| − | === Historical, regional, and proposed gender-neutral singular pronouns[edit] === |
||
| ⚫ | |||
Baron goes on to describe how relics of these gender-neutral terms survive in some British dialects of Modern English (for example ''hoo'' for "she", in Yorkshire), and sometimes a pronoun of one gender might be applied to a human or non-human animal of the opposite gender. This aforementioned ''hoo'' is also sometimes used in the West Midlands and south-west England as a common gender pronoun. |
Baron goes on to describe how relics of these gender-neutral terms survive in some British dialects of Modern English (for example ''hoo'' for "she", in Yorkshire), and sometimes a pronoun of one gender might be applied to a human or non-human animal of the opposite gender. This aforementioned ''hoo'' is also sometimes used in the West Midlands and south-west England as a common gender pronoun. |
||
| Line 49: | Line 9: | ||
In some West Country dialects, the pronoun ''er'' can be used in place of either ''he'' or ''she'', although only in weak (unstressed) positions such as in tag questions. |
In some West Country dialects, the pronoun ''er'' can be used in place of either ''he'' or ''she'', although only in weak (unstressed) positions such as in tag questions. |
||
| − | Additionally, in Essex, in the south-east of England, in the Middle English period, the spelling "hye" |
+ | Additionally, in Essex, in the south-east of England, in the Middle English period, the spelling "hye" could refer to either he or she. More recently, in the city of Baltimore, and possibly other cities in the United States, ''yo'' has come to be used as a gender-neutral pronoun. |
| − | |||
| − | More recently, in the city of Baltimore, and possibly other cities in the United States, ''yo'' has come to be used as a gender-neutral pronoun. |
||
Various proposals for the use of other non-standard pronouns have been introduced since at least the 19th century. |
Various proposals for the use of other non-standard pronouns have been introduced since at least the 19th century. |
||
| − | According to Dennis Baron, the neologism that received the greatest partial mainstream acceptance was Charles Crozat Converse's 1884 proposal of ''thon'' |
+ | According to Dennis Baron, the neologism that received the greatest partial mainstream acceptance was Charles Crozat Converse's 1884 proposal of ''thon''<sup>]</sup> a contraction of "that one" (other sources date its coinage to 1858): |
| − | |||
| ⚫ | "Co" |
||
| ⚫ | "Co" was coined by feminist writer Mary Orovan in 1970. "Co" is in common usage in intentional communities of the Federation of Egalitarian Communities, and "co" appears in the bylaws of several of these communities. In addition to use when the gender of the antecedent is unknown or indeterminate, some use it as gender-blind language and always replace gender-specific pronouns. |
||
| ⚫ | Several variants of ''ze'' |
||
| ⚫ | Several variants of ''ze'' have been proposed, with different object forms, to meet the need of unspecified gender situations and transgender persons. Kate Bornstein, an American transgender author, used the pronoun forms ''ze'' and ''hir'' in the book "Nearly Roadkill: an Infobahn erotic adventure" in 1996. Jeffrey A. Carver, an American science fiction writer, used the pronoun ''hir'' in the novel "From a Changeling Star" for a different-gendered nonhuman, in 1989. |
||
| − | === List of standard and non-standard third-person singular pronouns[edit] === |
||
{| class="article-table" |
{| class="article-table" |
||
! |
! |
||
| Line 72: | Line 28: | ||
!Reflexive |
!Reflexive |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| − | ! colspan="6" | |
+ | ! colspan="6" |Common pronouns |
|- |
|- |
||
!he |
!he |
||
| Line 112: | Line 68: | ||
!'em |
!'em |
||
|– |
|– |
||
| − | |I called ''<nowiki/>'em'' |
+ | |I called ''<nowiki/>'em<nowiki/>'' |
|– |
|– |
||
|– |
|– |
||
| Line 167: | Line 123: | ||
|e likes ''emself'' |
|e likes ''emself'' |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| + | !tey |
||
| − | !tey<sup>[''pronunciation?'']</sup> |
||
(Miller&Swift, 1971) |
(Miller&Swift, 1971) |
||
|''tey'' is laughing |
|''tey'' is laughing |
||
| Line 175: | Line 131: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| + | !xe |
||
| − | !xe<sup>[''pronunciation?'']</sup> |
||
(Rickter, c. 1973) |
(Rickter, c. 1973) |
||
|''xe'' is laughing |
|''xe'' is laughing |
||
| Line 183: | Line 139: | ||
|xe likes ''xemself'' |
|xe likes ''xemself'' |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| + | !te |
||
| − | !te<sup>[''pronunciation?'']</sup> |
||
(Farrel, 1974) |
(Farrel, 1974) |
||
|''te'' is laughing |
|''te'' is laughing |
||
| Line 191: | Line 147: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| + | !ey |
||
| − | !ey<sup>[''pronunciation?'']</sup> |
||
(Elverson, 1975) |
(Elverson, 1975) |
||
|''ey'' is laughing |
|''ey'' is laughing |
||
| Line 215: | Line 171: | ||
|ve likes ''verself'' |
|ve likes ''verself'' |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| + | !hu |
||
| − | !hu<sup>[''pronunciation?'']</sup> |
||
(Humanist, 1982) |
(Humanist, 1982) |
||
|''hu'' is laughing |
|''hu'' is laughing |
||
| Line 231: | Line 187: | ||
|E likes ''Emself'' |
|E likes ''Emself'' |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| − | !ze |
+ | !ze, mer |
(Creel, 1997) |
(Creel, 1997) |
||
|''ze'' is laughing |
|''ze'' is laughing |
||
| Line 247: | Line 203: | ||
|ze (zie, sie) likes ''hirself'' |
|ze (zie, sie) likes ''hirself'' |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| + | !zhe |
||
| − | !zhe<sup>[''pronunciation?'']</sup> |
||
(Foldvary, 2000) |
(Foldvary, 2000) |
||
|''zhe'' is laughing |
|''zhe'' is laughing |
||
| Line 263: | Line 219: | ||
|sie likes ''hirself'' |
|sie likes ''hirself'' |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| + | !peh |
||
| − | !peh<sup>[''pronunciation?'']</sup> |
||
(Dicebox, 2012?) |
(Dicebox, 2012?) |
||
|''peh'' is laughing |
|''peh'' is laughing |
||
| Line 279: | Line 235: | ||
|ze (zie, sie) likes ''zirself/zemself'' |
|ze (zie, sie) likes ''zirself/zemself'' |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| + | !fae |
||
| − | !fae<sup>[''pronunciation?'']</sup> |
||
|''fae'' is laughing |
|''fae'' is laughing |
||
|I called ''faer'' |
|I called ''faer'' |
||
| Line 285: | Line 241: | ||
|that is ''faers'' |
|that is ''faers'' |
||
|fae likes ''faerself'' |
|fae likes ''faerself'' |
||
| − | |} |
+ | |} |
| + | |||
| + | == Subsets == |
||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | ''Main article: [[Nounself]]'' |
||
| + | |||
| + | '''Nounself pronouns''' are a subset of neopronouns that are more directly based on words, often nouns. |
||
| + | =====History ===== |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | The earliest example of what could be called a nounself pronoun was proposed by by American lawyer Charles Crozat Converse in 1884. Converse took the words "this one" and "that one" and proposed ''thon'' as a gender-neutral pronoun set.{{Quote|thon. Pronoun of the 3rd person, common gender, meaning “that one, he she, or it”: a neoterism proposed by Charles Crozat Converse, and apparently complying with the neoteristic canons, since it supplies an antecedent blank, obeys a simple and obvious analogy, and is euphonious.|—Funk and Wagnalls, Supplement to A Standard Dictionary of the English Language, 1903|https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/third-person-gender-neutral-pronoun-thon}}For most of the 20th century, ''thon'' appeared in various publications of Funk and Wagnalls, and also spread to another dictionary, Merriam-Webster’s Second New International Dictionary (1934 edition). ''Thon'' was removed from abridged dictionary in the third edition. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | Using fae as a pronoun started out half a joke, a 1am offhand comment that fae would be one of the only things I could use as a pronoun and identify with. The next morning, it wasn’t so much a joke anymore, and by the end of the day my girlfriend and I had come up with how fae would work as a pronoun. |
||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | My personal view on this is that fae and fae creatures as stand outside the binary. They probably have some form of gender, but it’s most definitely not our human binary. Angels, on the other hand, are genderless. They have no sex and they have no gender. Together, fae and angels are the two sides of androgyny that are possible, and kind of form a secondary arc around the male/female binary: that of gendered/genderless. |
||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | …so in some ways, I’m using fae as a giant ‘fuck you’ to the gender binary and a refusal of much of the American culture surrounding gender. My gender is yes. Except when it’s no. Either way, it’s not male or female and using a pronoun that is very associated with creatures that stand outside humankind is, for me at least, a very good way to remind people of this constantly.|Eidolan}} |
||
| + | ====Emojiself==== |
||
| + | ''Main article: [[Emojiself]]'' |
||
| + | |||
| + | '''Emojiself pronouns''' are a subset of neopronouns and nounself pronouns that replace the content of the pronoun entirely with an emoji. |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Usage == |
||
| + | |||
| + | ==Misgendering== |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | |||
| + | Using the incorrect pronouns for someone when you are aware of their pronouns is misgendering. Misgendering is an act of erasure and transphobia. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | *Another common claim is that using fae/faer or similar pronouns is cultural appropriate against Pagans/Celtrics; However these aren't the only cultures that have fae<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairy#Origins</ref>, the original coiner identified as a fae faerself<ref>https://heterosexualisnotadefault.tumblr.com/post/635251444970291201/pronouns-i-have-encountered-in-no-particular-order</ref>, and Celts and Pagans are statistically more likely to feel actively good <ref>https://everypronoun.tumblr.com/post/644179322689798144/on-faefaer-pronouns-and-cultural-appropriation</ref>about someone’s fae/faer pronouns, even when that person is not a Celt/Pagan. |
||
== List of neopronouns == |
== List of neopronouns == |
||
''See main article: [[Neopronoun/List]]'' |
''See main article: [[Neopronoun/List]]'' |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | File:Neopronouns (1).png |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | File:Neopronoun Trans.png |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | <br /> |
||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
[[Category:Pronoun]] |
[[Category:Pronoun]] |
||
[[Category:Terminology]] |
[[Category:Terminology]] |
||
Revision as of 06:34, 5 June 2021
|
This Article does not meet the Wiki's standards! 🚧 Reason: Needs more sources about historical neopronouns (thin, etc), usage section needs statistics on neopronouns from the gender census |
Neopronouns are defined as are any set of singular third person pronouns that are not officially recognized in the language they are used in, typically created with the intent of being a gender neutral pronoun set.
Contents
History
Historically, there were two gender-neutral pronouns native to English dialects, ou and (h)a. According to Dennis Baron's Grammar and Gender:
Baron goes on to describe how relics of these gender-neutral terms survive in some British dialects of Modern English (for example hoo for "she", in Yorkshire), and sometimes a pronoun of one gender might be applied to a human or non-human animal of the opposite gender. This aforementioned hoo is also sometimes used in the West Midlands and south-west England as a common gender pronoun.
In some West Country dialects, the pronoun er can be used in place of either he or she, although only in weak (unstressed) positions such as in tag questions.
Additionally, in Essex, in the south-east of England, in the Middle English period, the spelling "hye" could refer to either he or she. More recently, in the city of Baltimore, and possibly other cities in the United States, yo has come to be used as a gender-neutral pronoun.
Various proposals for the use of other non-standard pronouns have been introduced since at least the 19th century.
According to Dennis Baron, the neologism that received the greatest partial mainstream acceptance was Charles Crozat Converse's 1884 proposal of thon] a contraction of "that one" (other sources date its coinage to 1858):
"Co" was coined by feminist writer Mary Orovan in 1970. "Co" is in common usage in intentional communities of the Federation of Egalitarian Communities, and "co" appears in the bylaws of several of these communities. In addition to use when the gender of the antecedent is unknown or indeterminate, some use it as gender-blind language and always replace gender-specific pronouns.
Several variants of ze have been proposed, with different object forms, to meet the need of unspecified gender situations and transgender persons. Kate Bornstein, an American transgender author, used the pronoun forms ze and hir in the book "Nearly Roadkill: an Infobahn erotic adventure" in 1996. Jeffrey A. Carver, an American science fiction writer, used the pronoun hir in the novel "From a Changeling Star" for a different-gendered nonhuman, in 1989.
| Nominative (subject) | Oblique (object) | Independent genitive
(Possessive ) |
Dependent genitive
(Possessive) |
Reflexive | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Common pronouns | |||||
| he | he is laughing | I called him | his eyes gleam | that is his | he likes himself |
| she | she is laughing | I called her | her eyes gleam | that is hers | she likes herself |
| it | it is laughing | I called it | its eyes gleam | that is its | it likes itself |
| one | one is laughing | I called one | one's eyes gleam | that is one's | one likes oneself |
| they | they are laughing | I called them | their eyes gleam | that is theirs | they like themselves
they like themself |
| 'em | – | I called 'em | – | – | – |
| yo
(regional, c. 2004) |
Yo is laughing | I called yo | yos eyes gleam | that is yos | yo likes yoself |
| Written conventions based on traditional pronouns | |||||
| she/he | he/she is laughing | I called him/her | his/her eyes gleam | that is his/hers | he/she likes him/herself |
| s/he | s/he is laughing | I called him/r | his/r eyes gleam | that is his/rs | s/he likes him/herself |
| hhe
(French, 1986) |
hhe is laughing | – | – | – | – |
| Artificial and proposed epicene pronouns | |||||
| thon
(Converse, 1884) |
thon is laughing | I called thon | thons eyes gleam | that is thons | thon likes thonself |
| e
(Rogers, 1890) |
e is laughing | I called em | es eyes gleam | that is es | e likes emself |
| tey
(Miller&Swift, 1971) |
tey is laughing | I called tem | ter eyes gleam | that is ters | |
| xe
(Rickter, c. 1973) |
xe is laughing | I called xem | xyr eyes gleam | that is xyrs | xe likes xemself |
| te
(Farrel, 1974) |
te is laughing | I called tir | tes eyes gleam | ||
| ey
(Elverson, 1975) |
ey is laughing | I called em | eir eyes gleam | that is eirs | ey likes eirself |
| per
(Piercy, 1979) |
per is laughing | I called per | per eyes gleam | that is pers | per likes perself |
| ve
(Hulme, c. 1980) |
ve is laughing | I called ver | vis eyes gleam | that is vis | ve likes verself |
| hu
(Humanist, 1982) |
hu is laughing | I called hum | hus eyes gleam | that is hus | hu likes humself |
| E
(Spivak, 1983) |
E is laughing | I called Em | Eir eyes gleam | that is Eirs | E likes Emself |
| ze, mer
(Creel, 1997) |
ze is laughing | I called mer | zer eyes gleam | that is zers | ze likes zemself |
| ze, hir
(Bornstein, 1998) |
ze (zie, sie) is laughing | I called hir | hir eyes gleam | that is hirs | ze (zie, sie) likes hirself |
| zhe
(Foldvary, 2000) |
zhe is laughing | I called zhim | zher eyes gleam | that is zhers | zhe likes zhimself |
| sie, hir
(Hyde, 2001) |
sie is laughing | I called hir | hir eyes gleam | that is hirs | sie likes hirself |
| peh
(Dicebox, 2012?) |
peh is laughing | I called pehm | peh's eyes gleam | that is peh's | peh likes pehself |
| ze, zir
(anon., c. 2013) |
ze (zie, sie) is laughing | I called zir/zem | zir/zes eyes gleam | that is zirs/zes | ze (zie, sie) likes zirself/zemself |
| fae | fae is laughing | I called faer | faer eyes gleam | that is faers | fae likes faerself |
Subsets
Nounself
Main article: Nounself
Nounself pronouns are a subset of neopronouns that are more directly based on words, often nouns.
History
It is unclear where the word "nounself" itself was first coined, although it may be on Tumblr because of the amount of popularity that nounself sets gained, starting in 2015.
Thonself
The earliest example of what could be called a nounself pronoun was proposed by by American lawyer Charles Crozat Converse in 1884. Converse took the words "this one" and "that one" and proposed thon as a gender-neutral pronoun set.
| “ | thon. Pronoun of the 3rd person, common gender, meaning “that one, he she, or it”: a neoterism proposed by Charles Crozat Converse, and apparently complying with the neoteristic canons, since it supplies an antecedent blank, obeys a simple and obvious analogy, and is euphonious. |
| — —Funk and Wagnalls, Supplement to A Standard Dictionary of the English Language, 1903, https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/third-person-gender-neutral-pronoun-thon |
For most of the 20th century, thon appeared in various publications of Funk and Wagnalls, and also spread to another dictionary, Merriam-Webster’s Second New International Dictionary (1934 edition). Thon was removed from abridged dictionary in the third edition.
Humanist Pronouns
Often called humanist pronouns, hu/hum/hus/hus/humself was used in several college humanities texts published by Bandanna Books and originated by editor Sasha Newborn in 1982.
Faeself And Others
One of the most commonly recognized nounself pronoun sets is fae/faer, first seen online in 2013.[1]
| “ | Okay, so!
Why did I choose fae/vaer as my pronouns? Because I am fae. I am described as such by people who don’t know me — fae and feline and not-exactly-human. I do identify as faen, and in some ways angel as well, and fae and angel are the goals of my presentation. My choice of fae as a pronoun reflects this. Using fae as a pronoun started out half a joke, a 1am offhand comment that fae would be one of the only things I could use as a pronoun and identify with. The next morning, it wasn’t so much a joke anymore, and by the end of the day my girlfriend and I had come up with how fae would work as a pronoun. To address the point about fae as binary or not — it depends on your source material. My personal view on this is that fae and fae creatures as stand outside the binary. They probably have some form of gender, but it’s most definitely not our human binary. Angels, on the other hand, are genderless. They have no sex and they have no gender. Together, fae and angels are the two sides of androgyny that are possible, and kind of form a secondary arc around the male/female binary: that of gendered/genderless. …so in some ways, I’m using fae as a giant ‘fuck you’ to the gender binary and a refusal of much of the American culture surrounding gender. My gender is yes. Except when it’s no. Either way, it’s not male or female and using a pronoun that is very associated with creatures that stand outside humankind is, for me at least, a very good way to remind people of this constantly. |
| — Eidolan |
Emojiself
Main article: Emojiself
Emojiself pronouns are a subset of neopronouns and nounself pronouns that replace the content of the pronoun entirely with an emoji.
Usage
Misgendering
See main article: Misgendering
Using the incorrect pronouns for someone when you are aware of their pronouns is misgendering. Misgendering is an act of erasure and transphobia.
Controversy
- It is a common claim (usually of Exclusionist groups) that neopronouns, especially nounself pronouns, are a new invention. However, this is untrue and ahistorical.
- Another common claim is that using fae/faer or similar pronouns is cultural appropriate against Pagans/Celtrics; However these aren't the only cultures that have fae[2], the original coiner identified as a fae faerself[3], and Celts and Pagans are statistically more likely to feel actively good [4]about someone’s fae/faer pronouns, even when that person is not a Celt/Pagan.
List of neopronouns
See main article: Neopronoun/List
Gallery
Flags
Combinations
Other
Sources
- ↑ https://heterosexualisnotadefault.tumblr.com/post/635251444970291201/pronouns-i-have-encountered-in-no-particular-order
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairy#Origins
- ↑ https://heterosexualisnotadefault.tumblr.com/post/635251444970291201/pronouns-i-have-encountered-in-no-particular-order
- ↑ https://everypronoun.tumblr.com/post/644179322689798144/on-faefaer-pronouns-and-cultural-appropriation

